Impact of arms race on human development between the United States and Russia

Authors

  • Teo En Thong Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
  • Chin Han Cong Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
  • Lawrence Tiong Ho Hao Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
  • Yusma Fariza Yasin Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia,
  • Junaidah Yusof Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia,

Keywords:

Human Development, Cold War, Arms Race, Comparative Historical Analysis

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of the Cold War arms race (1947–1991) between the United States and the Soviet Union on human development, with particular attention to healthcare, education, and economic growth. A mixed-methods approach integrates quantitative data from government budgets, health statistics, and economic performance with qualitative evidence from declassified documents, academic research, and case studies. A comparative historical method shows how resources were redirected from social programs to military spending, creating long-term structural weaknesses in both nations. The study expects to reveal the costs of underfunded healthcare, distorted educational priorities, and the consequences of Soviet central planning and the U.S. market-based system. It also examines the “security paradox,” where heavy military investment weakened social and economic stability even while aiming to increase national power. The research seeks to demonstrate a link between Cold War militarization and setbacks in human development, offering insights into the broader trade-offs of superpower competition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-14

How to Cite

Thong, T. E., Cong, C. H., Hao, L. T. H., Yasin, Y. F., & Yusof, J. (2025). Impact of arms race on human development between the United States and Russia. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development, 10(78). Retrieved from https://academicinspired.com/jised/article/view/3719