Pure technical efficiency and performance benchmarking of Malaysian F&B firms: A BCC-SBM analysis

Authors

  • Nur Dalila Norshahidi Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Mohd Faiez Suhaimin Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Mohd Azry Abdul Malik Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Norafefah Mohamad Sobri Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Nur Syaliza Hanim Che Yusof Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Siti Nurani Zulkfli Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Idari Ismail Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Nor Fatihah Abd Razak Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Muhammad Afwan Mohd Azmizam Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA ,Kelantan, (UiTM), Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55573/JISED.118766

Keywords:

Data envelopment analysis, BCC model, slack-based measure, pure technical efficiency, benchmarking, food and beverage industry, resource efficiency

Abstract

This study evaluates the relative revenue-generating resource efficiency of 14 publicly listed Malaysian food and beverage (F&B) companies using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Audited corporate data for financial years ending in 2025 were analysed using property, plant and equipment (PPE) and employee headcount as inputs, with revenue as the output. An input-oriented Banker–Charnes–Cooper (BCC) model under variable returns to scale was first employed to estimate radial pure technical efficiency. Peer-group analysis was subsequently conducted to identify the conditional benchmark prominence of frontier firms, followed by an input-oriented slack-based measure (SBM) to diagnose input-specific excesses among firms located below the radial frontier. Five companies achieved radial BCC scores of 1.000, while nine were below the frontier. Three-A Resources showed the highest conditional benchmark prominence under the reported optimal solutions. The SBM analysis identified the largest potential PPE reduction for Spritzer and the largest employee reduction for CAB Cakaran. The findings demonstrate that radial efficiency measurement and non-radial slack analysis provide complementary information on resource utilisation, with the latter revealing substantial differences in the sources of inefficiency across firms. The results are sample-specific and should therefore be interpreted as exploratory decision-support evidence rather than prescriptive resource-reduction targets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajija, S. R., Yasin, M. Z., & Duasa, J. (2018). The efficiency of large and medium scale of the food and beverage industrial production in East Java: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) approaches. East Java Economic Journal, 2(2), 139–157.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

Bolós, V. J., Benítez, R., & Coll-Serrano, V. (2023). Continuous models combining slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 31(2), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-022-00813-5

Charles, V., Aparicio, J., & Zhu, J. (2019). The curse of dimensionality of decision-making units: A simple approach to increase the discriminatory power of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(3), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.025

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b136381

Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1–39). Springer.

Cova-Alonso, D. J., Díaz-Hernández, J. J., & Martínez-Budría, E. (2021). A strong efficiency measure for CCR/BCC models. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(1), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.006

Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1

Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008

Erena, O. T., Kalko, M. M., & Debele, S. A. (2021). Technical efficiency, technological progress and productivity growth of large and medium manufacturing industries in Ethiopia: A data envelopment analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1997160. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1997160

Kedžo, M. G., & Lukač, Z. (2021). The financial efficiency of small food and drink producers across selected European Union countries using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(2), 586–600.

Khezrimotlagh, D., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2021). Number of performance measures versus number of decision making units in DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 303(1–2), 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03411-y

Lee, Y. C., Lim, G. T., & Lean, H. H. (2025). What predicts the technical efficiency in Malaysia's food processing industry? Journal of Economics and Sustainability, 7(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.32890/jes2025.7.1.3

Machmud, A., Ahman, E., Dirgantari, P. D., Waspada, I., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2019). Data envelopment analysis: The efficiency study of food industry in Indonesia. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(1), 479–488.

Makkar, M., & Illiyan, A. (2026). Unveiling efficiency and productivity patterns in Indian sugar companies: A DEA-Malmquist approach. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-03-2025-0133

Mavrommati, A., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Pliakoura, A., & Kalogiannidis, S. (2025). Assessing operational and investment efficiency in the Greek dairy industry: A DEA-based composite model. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 72(3), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2025-0028

Mohd Noor, M. A., Moi, M. R., & Abdul Kader, R. (2016). The efficiency of halal processed food industry in Malaysia. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 6(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT10120160601

Mohsenirad, S., & Triantis, K. (2025). Testing for heterogeneity in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 351(2), 1537–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06460-0

Náglová, Z., & Šimpachová Pechrová, M. (2021). Technical efficiency of the food and drink industry and its determinants. Agricultural Economics, 67(10), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.17221/93/2021-AGRICECON

Rezaeiani, M. J., & Foroughi, A. A. (2018). Ranking efficient decision making units in data envelopment analysis based on reference frontier share. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.064

Rodmanee, S., & Huang, W.-C. (2013). Efficiency evaluation of food and beverage companies in Thailand: An application of relational two-stage data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(3), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.227

Sefeedpari, P., Shokoohi, Z., & Pishgar-Komleh, S. H. (2020). Dynamic energy efficiency assessment of dairy farming system in Iran: Application of window data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 124178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124178

Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49

Thanassoulis, E., Portela, M. C. S., & Despić, O. (2008). Data envelopment analysis: The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth (pp. 251–420). Oxford University Press.

Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5

Tsai, J.-F., Nguyen, N. H., & Lin, M.-H. (2022). Performance evaluation of food and beverage listed companies in Vietnam. Computers, Materials & Continua, 73(2), 3575–3593. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.030476

Downloads

Published

2026-10-25

How to Cite

Norshahidi, N. D., Suhaimin, M. F., Abdul Malik, M. A., Mohamad Sobri, N., Che Yusof, N. S. H., Zulkfli, S. N., … Mohd Azmizam, M. A. (2026). Pure technical efficiency and performance benchmarking of Malaysian F&B firms: A BCC-SBM analysis. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development, 11(87), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.55573/JISED.118766