Al-ḍamān dalam fiqh alam bina: Analisis tematik al-Iʿlān bi Aḥkām al-Bunyān karya Ibn al-Rāmī

Authors

  • Sharifah Fadylawaty Syed Abdullah Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Hamizan Ab Hamid Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Amal Hayati Ishak Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies (ACIS), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55573/JISED.118743

Keywords:

al-Ḍamān, fiqh alam bina, Ibn al-Rāmī, al-Iʿlān bi Aḥkām al-Bunyān, kemudaratan, liabiliti, Ahl al-Maʿrifah

Abstract

Kajian ini meneliti al-Ḍamān dalam fiqh alam bina berdasarkan al-Iʿlān bi Aḥkām al-Bunyān karya Ibn al-Rāmī. Objektifnya ialah mengenal pasti tema utama al-Ḍamān dan mensintesis hubungannya sebagai kerangka konseptual pertanggungjawaban dan pemulihan hak. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui analisis dokumen dan analisis kandungan secara tematik. Pengekodan awal dilaksanakan oleh penulis pertama, disemak oleh penulis bersama dan dipersetujui melalui perbincangan. Enam tema dikenal pasti, iaitu pembuktian dan penentuan punca kemudaratan; asas pembentukan al-Ḍamān; pengetahuan tentang risiko dan kegagalan bertindak; penaksiran kerugian; peranan ahl al-Maʿrifah; serta pemulihan kemudaratan. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa kerosakan fizikal sahaja tidak memadai untuk menentukan tanggungan. Pertanggungjawaban memerlukan pembuktian kemudaratan, atribusi sebab, penelitian asas tanggungan dan penaksiran kerugian. Kepakaran teknikal menyokong penentuan fakta pada peringkat yang berkaitan. Analisis turut membezakan kewajipan ganti rugi daripada penghapusan bahaya dan pelarasan balasan kontrak, walaupun ketiga-tiganya berkaitan dengan perlindungan hak. Enam tema tersebut merupakan sintesis analitikal kajian dan bukan teori eksplisit Ibn al-Rāmī. Sumbangan kajian ialah penyusunan hubungan antara fakta fizikal, asas tanggungan, ukuran kerugian dan penyelesaian hak dalam kerangka fiqh alam bina. Penggunaannya tertakluk pada perincian hukum setiap kes dan batas sumber kajian.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alomari, O. M. (2022). Identification and categorization of building defects. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(2), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100204

al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1997). Al-fiqh al-Islāmī wa adillatuhu (4th ed., Vols. 1–8). Dār al-Fikr.

Asyiqin, I. Z., Akbar, M. F., Wirayudha, D. P., & Abul Hisyam, A. (2025). Reconciling ownership risk under Islamic economic law: Comparative analysis of Indonesian and Malaysian contracts. Indonesia Private Law Review, 6(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v6i2.4545

Bin Mohamad, A. B. (2021). Islamic tort law. In M. Bussani & A. J. Sebok (Eds.), Comparative tort law: Global perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 469–516). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

Ezziti, B.-E., El Hattach, M., & Ezziti, M. (2018). Islamic law and neighborhood building principles: The cases of privacy and avoidance of harming. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 25(1), 329–336. https://ijias.issr-journals.org/abstract.php?article=IJIAS-18-203-50

Faqih, F., & Zayed, T. (2021). Defect-based building condition assessment. Building and Environment, 191, 107575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107575

Hakim, B. S. (1986). Arabic-Islamic cities: Building and planning principles. Kegan Paul International.

Holijah, & Rizal, M. (2022). Islamic compensation concept: The consumer dispute settlement pattern in Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 6(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V6I1.8951

Ibn al-Rāmī, M. ibn I. (1999). Kitāb al-Iʿlān bi Aḥkām al-Bunyān. Markaz al-Nashr al-Jāmiʿī.

Ibn ʿArafah, M. (2014). Al-mukhtaṣar al-fiqhī (Ḥ. ʿA. R. M. Khayr, Ed.). Muʾassasat Khalaf Aḥmad al-Ḥabtūr li-l-Aʿmāl al-Khayriyyah. https://shamela.ws/book/16968

Ibn Farḥūn, I. (1986). Tabṣirat al-ḥukkām fī uṣūl al-aqḍiyah wa manāhij al-aḥkām. Maktabat al-Kulliyyāt al-Azhariyyah. https://shamela.ws/book/21595

Ibn Sahl, ʿĪ. (2007). Dīwān al-aḥkām al-kubrā aw al-iʿlām bi-nawāzil al-aḥkām wa quṭr min siyar al-ḥukkām (Y. Murād, Ed.). Dār al-Ḥadīth. https://shamela.ws/book/14593

Ibn Yūnus, M. (2013). Al-jāmiʿ li-masāʾil al-Mudawwanah. Maʿhad al-Buḥūth al-ʿIlmiyyah wa Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-Islāmī, Jāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā. https://shamela.ws/book/18607

Miharja, J. (2016). Konsep ganti rugi perspektif hukum Islam. Mu’amalat: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 8(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.20414/mu.v8i2.1997

Mohd Dian, A., Ismail, I., Ya’cob, S. N., Abu Bakar, N., & Ikhsan, M. I. (2025). Latent defects: Navigating the defects liability period and legal action deadlines for homebuyers in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 23(1), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i35.1682

Mortada, H. (2003). Traditional Islamic principles of built environment. RoutledgeCurzon.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Olanrewaju, A., Tan, Y. Y., & Soh, S. N. (2022). Defect characterisations in the Malaysian affordable housing. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(4), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-11-2018-0095

Sandanayake, M., Yang, W., Chhibba, N., & Vrcelj, Z. (2022). Residential building defects investigation and mitigation—A comparative review in Victoria, Australia, for understanding the way forward. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), 3689–3711. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2021-0232

Sarkom, Y., Ghani, M. Z. A., Ariff, N. R. M., Jalil, M. K. A., & Kenawy, I. (2023). A comparative review of the statutory periodic building inspection implementation in the Klang Valley region, Malaysia and Hong Kong, China. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(5 Special Issue), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.022

Shooshtarian, S., Gurmu, A. T., & Mahmood, M. N. (2024). Application of the DEMATEL approach to analyse the root causes of building defects. Quality & Quantity, 58(5), 4641–4660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01872-3

Syed Abdullah, S. F., Muhamad, M. D., & Ishak, A. H. (2022). Fiqh frameworks of dharar (harm) principle in landuse based on Kitab al-I’lan bi Ahkam al-Bunyan. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 7(22), 15–26. https://doi.or

Downloads

Published

2026-10-25

How to Cite

Syed Abdullah, S. F., Ab Hamid, M. H., & Ishak, A. H. (2026). Al-ḍamān dalam fiqh alam bina: Analisis tematik al-Iʿlān bi Aḥkām al-Bunyān karya Ibn al-Rāmī. Journal of Islamic, Social, Economics and Development, 11(87), 634–653. https://doi.org/10.55573/JISED.118743