The effect of digital competency among university teachers on personalized instruction in Shandong Province of China with the mediation of technological self-efficacy
Keywords:
Digital competency, technological self-efficacy, personalized instruction, university teachers in Shandong Province, structural equation modellingAbstract
This article examines how university teachers’ digital competency influences the implementation of personalized instruction in Shandong Province, China, and whether technological self-efficacy mediates this relationship. The study responds to a persistent policy-practice gap in digital higher education: while universities have invested heavily in smart platforms, learning management systems, and digital teaching infrastructure, personalized instruction remains uneven across institutional contexts. Drawing on digital competency frameworks, Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, differentiated instruction theory, and the TPACK framework, the study conceptualizes digital competency as a multidimensional teacher capacity that can support responsive, data-informed, and learner-centered instruction. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among full-time university teachers in Shandong Province. A total of 500 questionnaires were returned, and 428 valid responses were retained after data screening. Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a second-order measurement model consisting of Digital Competency, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Personalized Instruction. The final model retained 63 items across 13 first-order dimensions. The structural model showed excellent fit: chi-square = 1898.840, df = 1873, p = .333, chi-square/df = 1.014, CFI = .997, TLI = .997, and RMSEA = .006. Digital competency significantly predicted personalized instruction (beta = .291, p < .001) and technological self-efficacy (beta = .639, p < .001). Technological self-efficacy also significantly predicted personalized instruction (beta = .577, p < .001). Mediation analysis showed that technological self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between digital competency and personalized instruction, with a standardized indirect effect of .369 and a total effect of .660. The findings suggest that digital competency affects personalized instruction not only as a technical-pedagogical capability but also through teachers’ confidence in applying technology. The findings provide empirical evidence regarding how university teachers’ digital competency and technological self-efficacy jointly shape personalized instruction in Chinese higher education.










